Philips - Sense & Simplicity
Home » Education » About light therapy » Light box comparison

Light box comparison

Warning: Numerous light therapy companies advertise comparison charts to show their product's superiority. Unfortunately, comparison charts are almost always subjective, and listed specifications are often irrelevant or not accepted by the research community. The following comparison chart lists which items are important, which are not essential and which are marketing gimmicks.

Recognized measures for light therapy performance 1 2

Specification
Clinically tested 3
Published research 4
Ocular safety tested 5
Treatment field, distance 6
10,000 lux 7
Specific bandwidth technology (BLUEWAVE) 8
Ultra violet protection 9
Parobolic reflection 10
Electronic ballast (eliminate flicker) Non-essential
Specialized lens for diffuse field of light 11
Broad spectrum, non UV 12
Full-spectrum, non UV 13 Non-essential
Full-spectrum, UV 14 Not accepted
Kelvin color temperature (5,000+K) 15 Not accepted
Color rendering index (CRI 100) 16 Not accepted
Electro-magnetic frequency (EMF) shielding 17 Non-essential
Radio frequency shielding 18 Non-essential
Electric field shielding 19 Non-essential
UL, CE, CSA listing
All other claims Not accepted

Companies to avoid

As a general rule, you should avoid companies that promote "Non-essential" or "Not accepted" features as necessary components for successful or safe light therapy. The National Lighting Product Information Program, Lighting Research Center reports that these features are used as 'marketing gimmicks' and have no relevance to effective light therapy.20

Find out more about why we list Kelvin and CRI Values for our products »

Society for light treatment and biological rhythms

In addition, the Society for Light Treatment and Biological Rhythms (SLTBR, the medical research body), has received several documented complaints from researchers and manufacturers concerning false claims, ineffectiveness and safety of several 'light box companies,' particularly from companies who market mainly via the Internet.

In 2000, a survey of light therapy companies showed that most non-research affiliated companies grossly exaggerated their product's performance, while some openly advocated the use of UV light to treat Winter Blues. Unfortunately no policing organization regulates the production and sale of light therapy equipment. Ineffective equipment can cause patients to turn to antidepressants and lead physicians to become skeptical about light therapy's effectiveness. Unsafe equipment can lead to ocular damage. In order to avoid this problem, the potential light therapy user should consider companies, which support and participate in published light therapy studies.

1 Testing requirements used or accepted by the Society for Light Treatment and Biological Rhythms (SLTBR) or accredited university research program.
2 Society for Light Treatment and Biological Rhythms. Light Treatment Biol Rhythms. 1991;3:45-50
3 Terman M, Terman JS. Light Therapy. In: Kryger MH, Roth T, Dement WC, eds. Principles and Practices of Sleep Medicine. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders, 2000;1258-1274
4 Ibid
5 Gallin PF, et al. Amer J Ophthalmol 1995;119:202-210
6 Partonin T. Light Therapy. In: Partonen, T, eds. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press, 2001 65-78
7 Terman M, Terman JS. Bright Light Therapy: Side effects and benefits across the spectrum. J Clin Psychiatry. 1999;60:799-808
8 Brainard G et al. Action spectrum for melatonin regulation in humans: Evidence for a novel circadian photoreceptor. J Neursci 2001; 21(16):6405-6412
9 Lam, R. et al. (ed): Light therapy: Indications and efficacy. Systematic Medication Management. Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatry Basel Karger 1997; 25:215-234
10 Terman, M. J Prac Psych and Behav Hlth 1998; 287-303
10 Ibid
12 Lam, R. W., & Levitt, A. J. 1999. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Clinical & Academic Publishing
13 Rea, M.S., M.G. Figueiro, J.D. Bullough. 2002. Circadian photobiology: An emerging framework for lighting practice and research. Lighting Res. Technol. 34.3: 177-190
14 Gallin PF, et al. Amer J Ophthalmol 1995;119:202-210 (p.208)
15 National Lighting Product Information Program (NLPIP), Lighting Research Center, accessed September 2004. Found at: http://www.lrc.rpi.edu/programs/nlpip/lightingAnswers/fullSpectrum/claims.asp
16 Ibid
17 EMF, Radio Frequency and Electric Field Shielding: Standards and hazard analyses are set by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) and the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). Current standard lighting components and ballasts conform to ACGIH/ICNIRP standards and are not an issue.
18 Ibid
19 Ibid